Domestic Fuel Manufacturing Is Finally on the Agenda

The Albanese government has added fuel manufacturing as the eighth priority area for investment from the $15 billion National Reconstruction Fund. It is a small change to the fund’s mandate on paper, but a significant one in substance. For the first time, taxpayer money earmarked for building Australia’s industrial base can be directed toward expanding domestic refining capacity and fuel storage. Industry Minister Tim Ayres has confirmed there is no prohibition on the NRF investing in refineries, storage, or other fuel security measures. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has flagged fuel security as a focus of next month’s budget.

This is a genuine shift. For years, the conversation about Australian fuel security has been stuck in the gap between acknowledging the problem and doing anything about it. Everyone knew the country imports roughly 90 per cent of its refined fuel. Everyone knew the closure of the Altona and Lytton refineries in 2021 left us with just two large-scale facilities, at Geelong and Brisbane’s Lytton. Everyone knew Australia holds the lowest fuel reserves of any International Energy Agency member. None of this was secret. But the political and economic case for investing in domestic capacity never quite got past the same three arguments: refining is a low-margin business, the world is transitioning away from fossil fuels, and the existing import model works.

The Iran war and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz have put those arguments under serious strain. The import model does not work if the country you are importing from cannot access crude, or if your refined fuel shipments are being redirected to higher-bidding countries, or if 187 tankers are stranded in the Gulf for weeks at a time. A low-margin refining business still matters if the alternative is running out of diesel. And the transition to electrification does not happen overnight. Heavy transport, agriculture, construction, mining, and regional communities will rely on diesel for years to come, regardless of how fast the passenger vehicle fleet turns over.

The NRF change opens the door to several possibilities. The government could back expansion of existing capacity at Geelong and Lytton. It could support new domestic production from projects like the Taroom Trough in Queensland, where iOR’s Eromanga refinery is already processing Shell’s condensate into diesel. It could invest in strategic storage to bring Australia closer to the International Energy Agency’s 90-day stockholding standard. Or it could do some combination of all three. What matters is that the policy framework now permits these investments, where previously it did not.

There is a broader point worth making. The window for structural reform in any industry is narrow. It opens during a crisis, when the cost of inaction becomes obvious to everyone, and it closes again when things return to normal. Right now, that window is open. The public, the business community and the government are all prepared to accept that Australia’s fuel security settings have been inadequate for decades. If the May budget delivers concrete investment in refining and storage, and if the NRF actually deploys capital rather than just rewriting its mandate, this crisis may end up producing something useful. If it does not, we will be back here next time a Middle East conflict disrupts global oil flows, having learned nothing.

For independent retailers, the short-term impact of the NRF change is limited. It does not fix today’s supply issues, it does not reduce current wholesale prices, and it does not guarantee any particular outcome for the independent channel. But the strategic direction matters. A country that refines more of its own fuel, stores more of its own reserves, and depends less on international shipping is a country where independent retailers have more reliable supply, more predictable pricing, and better long-term prospects. That is worth paying attention to, even if the benefits are years away.

The May budget will tell us whether the government is serious. A line item in a fund mandate is easy. Deploying billions of dollars into real projects that expand domestic capacity is hard. ServoPro will be watching closely, and we will continue to advocate for independent retailers to be recognised in any fuel security framework that emerges from this crisis.

Scroll to Top